ThesisOpen AccessMetadata saja
2024•Skripsi, Thesis, Disertasi, dan Tugas Akhir
The development of information technology encourages the use of electronic documents and electronic signatures in various transactions. The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of electronic signatures in Indonesia from a juridical perspective, focusing on existing regulations, namely Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) which was amended by Law Number 19 of 2016, as well as Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019. Based on the results of this study, the author concludes that this study aims to show that electronic signatures that meet the legal requirements are recognized as valid and equivalent to conventional signatures. However, there are still challenges in terms of security and public acceptance. There needs to be increased regulation, legal awareness, and technological infrastructure to support its effective use. Conclusions from this study, the author concludes that electronic signatures in Indonesia have legal validity in accordance with the ITE Law and its implementing regulations. Eligible electronic signatures are considered valid and have the same legal force as conventional signatures. Nonetheless, challenges such as security issues, technical validity, and acceptance by the community remain. Efforts to improve regulations, legal awareness, and technological infrastructure are needed to support the wider and effective use of electronic signatures in Indonesia.
ThesisOpen AccessMetadata saja
2021•Skripsi, Thesis, Disertasi, dan Tugas Akhir
The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of English questions for Eighth Grader Students of SMPN 2 Tarakan in the academic year 2019/2020. This research used a descriptive qualitative method. To take the sample, the researcher used simple random sampling. The researcher took 50 students as the research sample. To obtain the data the researcher used the English test and students' answer sheet. The data consisted of 40 multiple-choice questions. Whereas, the source of data was taken from the English summative test, answer key and 50 students answer sheets. Answer sheets were needed for statistical analysis to determine the quality of the items based on question analysis and the validity. The data obtained from the validity result were then interpreted to determine the achievement of the learning objective. The result of the data analysis showed that the English semester test questions were 24 items (60%) were valid questions and 16 items (40%) were invalid questions, and 3 items (7.5%) were at satisfactory validity level, 18 items (45%) were at satisfactory validity level, and 9 items (22.5%) were at poor validity level, 10 items (25%) were at very bad validity level. The result of the analysis showed that the quality of test items was valid 60% and invalid questions were 40. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded that the quality of the test items was good validity. The test items already got the achievement of learning objective.
ThesisOpen AccessMetadata saja
2021•
The purpose of this study was to determine and describe the quality of English questions for 7th Grade Students of SMPN 5 Tarakan in the academic year 2019/2020. This research used a descriptive quantitative method. A total of 50 students were took as the research sample using sample ramdom sampling. The data in this study were in the form of question sheets and students answer sheets. The test question sheet consisted of 50 multiple choice questions. Answer sheets were needed for statistical analysis to determine the quality of the items based on question analysis, validity and difficulty level. The result of the data analysis showed that the English semester test questions were 22 items (44%) were valid questions and 28 items (56%) were invalid questions, and 7 items (14%) were at satisfactory validiity level, 19 items (38%) were at poor validity level, 24 items (48%) were at very bad validity level. And the results of difficulty level showed that 19 items (38%) were difficult questions, 22 items (44%) were moderate questions, and 9 items (18%) were easy questions. It was concluded that the items analyzed were classified as bad items because there were only 4 items that could be accepted or could be used without revision, 21 items had to be revised, andd 25 items had to be discarded.
