ThesisOpen AccessMetadata saja
2024•
ABSTRACT Law Number 21 of 2019 concerning Animal, Fish and Plant Quarantine is a system for preventing the entry, exit and spread of animal pests and diseases, fish pests and diseases, and plant pest organisms, supervision and control in the territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. The Tarakan City Class II Agricultural Quarantine Center oversees the working area of North Kalimantan province and one district in East Kalimantan Province. Plant quarantine requirements must comply with the provisions that every carrier media imported into Indonesian territory must be equipped with a plant health certificate from the country of origin or transit country for the plant and its parts. Indonesia as a member country of GATT and based on the agreement on the Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement uses the standards of the International Plant Protection Convention to prevent the emergence of plant pest organisms in plants. This research aims to analyze the legal principles for dealing with plant smuggling and efforts to deal with plant smuggling without a health certificate according to Law Number 21 of 2019. This research applies a type of normative juridical research with a study approach to legal events that occur in the field. This research uses import data from 2020 to 2022 with the legal object of Malundung Port, Tarakan City, as one of the UPTs of the Class II Agricultural Quarantine Center, Tarakan City. Based on the results of the legal analysis, it was found that Article 86 states that every person who enters Carrier Media without completing a health certificate as intended in Article 33 will be punished with a maximum imprisonment of 10 (ten) years and a maximum fine of IDR 10,000,000,000. 00 (ten billion rupiah). The existence of this criminal threat is a criminal policy (penal policy) to prevent criminal acts of smuggling, as well as to eradicate it, even though there are administrative and civil sanctions. The effectiveness of the implementation of Law Number 21 of 2019 which regulates the authority of quarantine officials in carrying out intelligence, special police and investigative functions has been systematic and in sync with the principles of implementing quarantine in efforts to overcome plant smuggling without being equipped with a health certificate from the country of origin as well as efforts to try quarantine criminal cases. Keywords: Agricultural Quarantine Center, authority, health certificate, legal effectiveness.
ThesisOpen AccessMetadata saja
2021•
ABSTRAK MUHAMMAD AGUS SALIM: 1640501040 Skripsi ini berjudul “Tinjauan Yuridis Pembentukan Peraturan Desa Oleh Badan Permusyawaratan Desa (BPD) Di Desa Salimbatu”, Dr. Nurasikin, S.HI.,M.H sebagai pembimbing I dan Mawardi Khairi, S.H.,M.H sebagai Pembimbing II. Berdasarkan Permendagri No 110 Tahun 2016 Tentang Badan Permusyawaratan Desa, pada pasal 31 dan 32 mengenai fungsi Badan Permusyawaratan Desa iyalah membahas rancangan serta menetapkan Peraturan Desa bersama Kepala. Badan Permusyawartan Desa sebagai wadah untuk melaksanakan demokrasi berdasarkan Pancasila berkedudukan sejajar dan menjadi mitra Pemerintah Desa, terdapat beberapa jenis hubungan antara pemerintah desa dan Badan Perwakilan Desa. Peneltian skripsi ini bertujuan untuk menjawab permasalahan peneliti yaitu bagaimana kewenangan pembentukan peraturan desa oleh badan permusyawaratan desa dan kendala badan permusyawaratan desa dalam pembentukan peraturan desa di Desa Salimbatu. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini penelitian empiris ialah suatu metode penelitian hukum yang berfungsi untuk dapat melihat hukum dalam artian nyata serta meneliti bagaimana hukum disuatu lingkungan masyarakat. Hasil dari penelitian ini dapat diketahui bahwa Badan permusyawaratan Desa kurang berpartisipasi dan tidak menjalankan wewenangan dalam merancang pembentukan peraturan desa di Desa Salimbatu, adapun yang menjadi kendala Badan Permusyawaratan Desa dalam membentukan peraturan desa yaitu pendidikan dan sumber daya masyarakat desa yang masih rendah, kurang seminar serta pelatihan, kurangnya mensosialisasikan aturan-aturan peraturan desa, kurang kontribusi masyarakat dalam musyawarah pembentukan peraturan desa dan kurangnya anggaran BPD dalam menjalankan fungsi dan wewenanganya sebegai anggota BPD dan kerja sama yang tidak terjalin dengan baik antara Badaan Permusyawarata Desa dan pemerinntah desa dalam pembentukan peraturan desa. ABSTRACT MUHAMMAD AGUS SALIM: 1640501040 This thesis is entitled "Juridical Review of the Formation of Village Regulations by the Village Consultative Body (BPD) in Salimbatu Village", Dr. Nurasikin, S.HI., M.H as supervisor I and Mawardi Khairi, S.H., M.H as supervisor II. Based on Permendagri No. 110 of 2016 concerning the Village Consultative Body, in articles 31 and 32 regarding the function of the Village Consultative Body, it is to discuss the design and establish Village Regulations with the Head. The Village Consultative Body as a forum for implementing democracy based on Pancasila has an equal position and is a partner of the Village Government, there are several types of relationships between the village government and the Village Representative Body. This thesis research aims to answer the researcher's problem, namely how is the authority to form village regulations by the village consultative body and the constraints of the village consultative body in forming village regulations in Salimbatu Village. The method used in this research is empirical research, which is a legal research method that functions to be able to see the law in a real sense and examine how the law is in a community environment. The results of this study can be seen that the Village Consultative Body does not participate and does not exercise authority in designing the formation of village regulations in Salimbatu Village, while the obstacles for the Village Consultative Body in forming village regulations are education and village community resources which are still low, lack of seminars and training, lack of socializing the rules of village regulations, lack of community contribution in deliberation to form village regulations and lack of BPD budgets in carrying out their functions and authorities as BPD members and poor cooperation between the Village Consultative Body and the village government in forming village regulations.
